Bibliometric analysis of education as a common good. A focus on digital transformation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56162/transdigital200Keywords:
Education, Common Good, Covid-19, Digital transformationAbstract
Traditional educational systems have focused on solving social problems through the economic performance of the country, but they have frequently neglected other objectives that favor the creation of privileged groups. This is because a commercial and technical education has been provided with little impact on sustainability, social good, and social justice. Education as a common good aim to solve this problem by providing an education based on a humanist vision, focused on human dignity and the well-being of the members of the world. The theoretical construct of education as a common good, like any other, is in constant evolution. Limitations and theoretical gaps have even been identified when the concept is attributed to education. In this sense, it is important to update and reinterpret its concept from the perspective of global trends and challenges. Therefore, the objective of this article was to characterize education as a common good, emphasizing the dynamics presented from the coronavirus crisis and digital transformation. A systematic review of the bibliometric literature made it possible to systematize and classify different theoretical perspectives longitudinally. Key terms that characterized the concept of education as a public good from 2000 to 2022 were identified. Likewise, little-explored veins of research were identified, which contributes to the frontier of knowledge in a descriptive way.
References
Alhashimi, H. (2021). Future of digital cooperation. En H. Alhashimi, A. Fiallo, T. Freckleton, M. Ali Khalil, V. Mulachela & J. Viera. The Future of Diplomacy After COVID-19 (pp. 84-114). Routledge.
Cuban, L., & Shipps, D. (2000). Reconstructing the common good in education: Coping with intractable American dilemmas. Stanford University Press.
Civís Zaragoza, M., Esteban-Guitart, M., & Collet Sabé, J. (2023). Presentación del número especial de RED: “Nuevos retos, nuevas alianzas: universidades y ecosistemas educativos presenciales y virtuales”. RED Revista de Educación a Distancia, 23(74), 1-6. https://revistas.um.es/red/article/view/557741
Díez Gutiérrez, E. J., & Rodríguez Fernández, J. R. (Coords.) (2019). Educación para el bien común: hacia una práctica crítica, inclusiva y comprometida socialmente. Octaedro.
Escott Mota, M. d. P., Cruz Pérez, X. M., & Palacios, R. (2022). Digital transformation and new dynamics of the triple helix model. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 14(7), 1950-1958. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2021.1988418
Ford, M. P. (2002). Beyond the modern university: Toward a constructive postmodern university. Greenwood Publishing Group.
Licandro, O. D., & Yepes Chisco, S. L. (2018). La Educación Superior conceptualizada como bien común: el desafío propuesto por Unesco. Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria, 12(1), 6-33. https://doi.org/10.19083/ridu.12.715
Locatelli, R. (2018). Education as a public and common good: Reframing the governance of education in a changing context. Education Research and Foresight: Working Papers Series, No. 22. UNESCO https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000261614
Mulet-Forteza, C., Genovart-Balaguer, J., Mauleon-Mendez, E., & Merigó, J. M. (2019). A bibliometric research in the tourism, leisure and hospitality fields. Journal of Business Research, 101, 819-827.
Oseki, E. G., & Velarde, I. L. A. (2023). Educación para el bien común, o la educación como bien común. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Educativos, 53(1), 7-14.
Pomares, J., Ortega, A., & Abdala, M. B. (2021). Digitalization as a common good. Contribution to an inclusive recovery, Global Solutions Journal, 7. https://www.cippec.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Global-Solutions-Journal-7-Pomares-Abdala.pdf
Senent-De Frutos, J. A. (2020). Ignacio Ellacuría y el horizonte del bien común de la humanidad. Realidad: Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 155, 105-129. https://doi.org/10.5377/realidad.v0i155.10387
UNESCO (2015). Replantear la educación: ¿hacia un bien común mundial? UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000232697
UNESCO (2022). Más allá de los límites. Nuevas formas de reinventar la educación superior. Documento de trabajo para la Conferencia Mundial de Educación Superior. https://cdn.eventscase.com/www.whec2022.org/uploads/users/699058/uploads/6be1788a20aecc20c5468118ef386ed5f0271e46d0298d778d4c1ca2b235400e7d52e159117000427c73517b38607ed00208.62833bc1b5d6a.pdf
U?akl?o?lu, A. Y. (2020). The crucial effects of COVID-19 on digital law. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3572561
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84, 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Welch, V., Petticrew, M., Tugwell, P., Moher, D., O'Neill, J., Waters, E., & White, H. (2013). Extensión PRISMA-Equidad 2012: guías para la escritura y la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas enfocadas en la equidad en salud. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, 34(1), 60-67. https://www.paho.org/journal/sites/default/files/09--SPEC--Welch--60-67_RD6.pdf
Yang, L., Brotherhood, T., & Chankseliani, M. (2022). A crisis of opportunity at English universities: Rethinking higher education through the common good idea. Educational Review, 74(3), 591-608. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1965961
Zupic, I., & ?ater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Downloads
Autor de correspondencia
El autor de correspodencia se identifica con el siguiente símbolo: *Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2023 María del Pilar Escott-Mota, Carla Patricia Bermúdez-Peña, Francisco Flores-Agüero
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles in Transdigital are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions.
